The Coddling of the American Mind Chapter 8: Paranoid Parenting

 Chapter 8: Paranoid Parenting

“So many teens have lost the ability to tolerate distress and uncertainty, and a big reason for that is the way we parent them.” Kevin Ashworth

-parents allowing kids to learn independence are more often condemned today and blasted out on social media to intensify the outrage 

Ex. allowing a pre-teen to walk the part 3 block from their home in a gated community

Ex. allowing a teen to take public transportation

Modern Parenting:

-the paranoia and overprotection that has become normal features of American parenting

-we all should take reasonable precautions to protect our children’s physical safety

-we should not submit to the pull of safetyism which is overestimating danger, fetishizing safety, and not accepting any risk

-avoiding all risk as kids, to teens, to college students makes them more and more fragile and not equipped to stand in the world on their own as independent individuals

-iGen (born in 1995 and later) are having very different childhoods

-they suffer from higher levels of depression and anxiety

-in response, the rise of safetyism on college campuses has sky rocketed 

-modern parenting practices may unwittingly teach children the Great Untruths

-schools co-parent into the culture of safetyism

-there has been a shift to this more fearful and overprotective way of treating children

-there has been consequences to oversupervision which has prevented kids from growing strong and independent

A Parent’s Worst Fear:

-in the news, there is nothing worse then reading or watching a story of a child who has been harmed who was out of the sight of a parent/guardian

-that fear of “what could happen” or “that could have been my child” can be overwhelming

-but isolating a kid out of the fear of being harmed can also be harming as social media has its dark side that can infiltrate the mind of a kid

Actual Versus Imagined Risk:

-parents of iGen were raised were far more dangerous then they are today

-Baby Boomers and Gen-Zers grew up with rising rates of crime and mayhem

-Muggings were a normal part of urban life

-TV brought round-the-clock coverage of missing child cases in the 1980s so it is understandable that American parents grew fearful and defensive by the 1990s

-the new habits of fearful parenting seem to have become new national norms

-today, the extreme forms of safetyism are prevalent

-we do understand a mother’s fear that her son might encounter a pervert in a public restroom

***it would be better to teach the boy to recognize perverted or inappropriate bathroom behavior so he can get away from it on those very rare occasions when he might encounter it

Instead:

-teaching the boy to fear for his life and must maintain verbal contact with a parent every time he needs to use a public restroom

The Dangers of Safetyism:

Past Generations:

-1970s laugh at the safety concerns of today’s parents and to point out when they grew up, nobody wore seat belts or bike helmets, and most adults smoked (even around children), paint and gasoline were leaded, and children were encouraged to go-on their own- to parks and playgrounds, and kids returned home with the street lights came on in the neighborhood

-the tone can be mocking and dismissive of parenting today even though there has been life saving safety measures put in place like bike helmets and seat belts, smoking restrictions, removing lead prevents medical problems and deaths, so they all have saved many lives

***the success of childhood safety campaigns helps explain why modern parents often take a concern about safety to the extreme of safetyism

-when we attempt to produce perfectly safe systems, we almost inevitably create new and unforeseen problems 

-safety rules and programs, like most efforts to change complex systems

-protections come with costs, as kids miss the opportunities to learn skills, independence, and risk assessment

“The problem with this ‘everything is dangerous’ outlook is that over-protectiveness is a danger in and of itself”

-Antifragile, by placing a protective shield over our children, we inadvertently stunt their growth and deprive them of experiences they need to become successful and function adults

“Parents are going to ludicrous lengths to take the bums out of life for their children. However, parental hyperconcern has the net effect of making kids more fragile.”

***Most parents know this on some level but still find themselves hovering and overprotecting

-the blame for creating the culture of safetyism does not fall entirely on individual parents

-at a fundamental level, overparenting and safetyism are “problem of progress” along with having less kids makes parent hyper-actively engaged in overprotecting children

-parents spending time with their kids is generally a good thing, but too much close supervision and protection can morph into safetyism

-children are antifragile by nature and turns them into young adults who are more fragile and anxious, so receptive to the Untruth of Fragility

***What doesn’t kill you makes you weaker 

Pressured into Overprotection:

-most parents condemn helicopter parenting

-many parents want to do less hovering and give their kids more freedom

-this is not so easy when parents are pressured by other parents, schools, and even laws that push parents to be more protective than they would like to be 

-societal pressure often prompt parents to engage in “Worst-first Thinking”

-parents are always preparing for the worst possible outcomes

***Good parents are expected to believe that their children are in danger every moment they are unsupervised 

Ex. parents who reject overparenting and give their kids more freedom can actually be arrested

2015- 2 Florida parents were charged with felony child neglect when they were delayed getting home 

-the son couldn't get into the house so he played basketball in the driveway

-a neighbor called the police 

-the parents were arrested for negligence 

-the boy and his 4 year-old brother were put in foster care for a month

-even after being returned, the children were required to attend “play” therapy

Ex. parent left her daughter alone in her care while she went into a CVS pharmacy

2014- a passerby called the police who were able to open the car door

-the police reported the child was “responsive” and not in distress

-the girl was 11 years old and she had told her mom she wanted to just stay in the car

***Before paranoid parenting, eleven-year-olds could earn money and learn responsibility by baby sitting for neighbors

-busybodies are monitoring if 11 year-olds need babysitters 

-the mother was issued a misdemeanor summons and forced to appear in court

-when the police endorse they type of safetyism, it forces parents to overprotect

Ex. Police Chief in New Albany, Ohio advises that children should not be allowed outside without supervision until the age of 16

***when you combine peer pressure, shaming, and the threat of arrest, so no wonder parents simply don’t let their kids out of their sight anymore

***only reading safe books for safe kids

-at one time most great children’s books involve kids going off on adventures without adult supervision

-for parents who don’t want to put dangerous ideas in their kids’ heads 

Ex. Dora the Explorer (can be read but only with a parent)

Class Matters:

-with respect to parenting practices, social class matters far more than race

Define:

-middle class means middle class and above, including the upper class

-working class means below middle class including poor families 

Homes:

-children raised by two parents who each have four-year-college degrees and are married to each other throughout their children’s childhood (upper third of the socioeconomic spectrum)

-these families parenting style is “concerted cultivation”

-their task as cultivating their children’s talents while stimulating the development of their cognitive and social skills

-they fill their children’s calendar with adult guided activities, lessons, and experiences, and they closely monitor what happens in school 

-children are raised by a single or divorced parent (or other relative) who does not have a four-year-college degree (bottom third of the socioeconomic spectrum)

-these families parenting style is “natural growth parenting”

-working-class parents tend to believe that children will reach maturity without needing much guidance or interference for adults

-children will reach maturity without needing much guidance or interference from adults

-children experience long stretches of leisure time, child-initiated play, clear boundaries between adults and children, and daily interactions with kin 

-parents spend less time talking with their children 

-parents give more orders and directives

-kids get more unstructured and unsupervised play time 

-kids have good developing social skills and a sense of autonomy

iGen:

-college students are acting differently from previous generations

-middle class iGen (late Millennial) students were overscheduled and overparented as children

-working-class kids are therefore more likely to feel like “fish out of water” in college

Anti-fragility:

-severe adversity that hits kids early, especially in the absence of secure and loving attachment relationships with adults, does not make them stronger; it makes them weaker

-chronic, severe adversity creates “toxic stress”

-it resets children’s stress responses to kick in more readily and for longer periods in the future 

Moderate Stress:

-there needs to be a balance

-it needs to be buffered by supportive adults

-parents need to know the difference between stress that promotes the development of coping, address challenges, and solve problems

VS.

-children experiencing toxic stress have trouble concentrating, controlling impulse behavior, and following directions

College Campuses Mixture:

-students’ brains are shaped differently

-those bringing with them toxic stress may need different kinds of support as they bring with them all the scars and disadvantages with them

-those bringing with them concerted cultivation have been intensively monitored by an adult so bring a needy sense of security 

-they bring very different ways of damage and development

-one may bring underprotected qualities

-one may bring overmonitored and overprotective qualities 

***overparenting is probably a much greater cause of fragility on such campuses than is underparenting 

Safe and Unwise:

-paranoid parenting and the cult of safetyism teach kids some of the specific cognitive distortions

-parents discounting positives when parents overmonitor

“Any upside to free, unsupervised time (joy, independence, problem-solving, resilience) is seen as trivial, compared to the infinite harm the child could suffer without you there. There is nothing positive but safety.”

-parents also use negative filtering by saying, “look at all the foods/activities/words/people that could harm our kids 

***parents use dichotomous thinking: “If something isn’t 100% safe, it’s dangerous.”

3 Untruths: Us vs. Them, Emotional Reasoning, Fragility

-Paranoid parenting: to convince children that the whole world is full of danger; evil lurks in the shadows, on the streets, and in public parks and restrooms

-kids raised in this way are emotionally prepared to embrace the (Untruth of Us Versus Them): Life is a battle between good people and evil people

-this worldview that makes them fear and suspect strangers

-this teaches children to monitor themselves for the degree to which they “feel unsafe” and then talk about unsafe they feel

-they come to believe that “feeling’ unsafe (the feeling of being uncomfortable or anxious) is a reliable sign that they are unsafe (the Untruth of Emotional Reasoning): Always trust your feelings

-feeling these emotions is unpleasant; the feelings are dangerous in and of themselves–stress will harm them if it doesn’t kill them (The untruth of Fragility: What doesn’t kill you makes you weaker)

***these are schemas that guide the way they interpret new situations in high school and college 

-they see more danger in their environment and more hostile intent in the actions of others

-they are more likely than kids in previous generations to believe  that they should flee or avoid anything that could be construed as even a minor threat

-they are more likely to interpret words, books, and ideas in terms of safety versus danger, or good versus evil, 

***college campuses increase of requests for safe spaces, trigger warnings, microaggression training, and bias response teams 

***difficult to see how this way of thinking could produce well-educated, bold, and open-minded college graduates 

In Sum:

-when we overprotect children we harm them

-children are naturally antifragile

-children today have far more restricted childhoods 

-iGen (born after 1995) have been deprived of unsupervised time for play and exploration

-they have missed out on many of the challenges, negative experiences, and minor risks that help children develop into strong, competent, and independent adults 

-when children are repeatedly led to believe that the world is dangerous and that they cannot face it alone

-helicopter parenting combined with laws and social norms that make it hard to give kids unsupervised time may be having a negative impact on the mental health and resilience of young people today

-there is a large social class differences in parenting styles

-there is a difference between “concerted cultivation” and “natural growth parenting”

-paranoid parenting prepares today’s children to embrace the the three Great Untruths 

Posted Facebook Posts: 2 Timothy 3 What did you expect the end times to look like?

 At church this past Sunday was a much needed wake up call in that our country today has rejected the moral authority of God. We are in perilous times being ruled by perilous men/women. Today’s society follows the world’s demands instead of God’s commands. Morality has become subjective while many churches have succumbed to appearing religious, but has no true submission to His word.

Let’s reflect on what Jesus said in Matthew 24 as he described the signs of the times and the end of the age. There is no nation that is beyond God’s accountability. There is no more time to be just a casual Christian. Jesus outlines what was foretold by Daniel the prophet in the Old Testament. He speaks to what the great tribulation will entail. But then he moves to words of comfort to know that He will return for his children. All who believe he died for our sins, resurrected, and will be coming back again. The warning is we do not know when He will return, but we are to be watchful so we can be prepared to remain faithful in the midst of it. God will eventually give the nations up to their evil.

“Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen” (Romans 1: 24-25).

The apostle Paul in 2 Timothy 3:
The warning:
1-warns us that this is the age where evil becomes aggressive where men will be lovers of themselves and pleasure
2-describes people not politics is the problem because when men reject the authority of God we become the authority.
-people know of God but refuse to honor Him as God
3-the warnings are personal requiring of believers to have Biblical discernment
4-people will exploit the spirituality of others, corrupt minds will resist truth, and there will be disapproval concerning faith
The shift:
5-do not follow the deceived as they deceive many
6-we are called to be a man/woman of God holding fast to doctrine, purpose, faith, longsuffering, love, and perseverance
7-Paul connects to Timothy’s humanity by recounting his own life and how he discerned the cost as he confesses how the Lord delivered him
-we are not guaranteed from suffering but we are delivered through hardships
-persecution will come, but be wise to the evil
8-Paul tells Timothy to watch out for evil men and impostors
-to demonstrate your convictions even if it is costly
-we must continue in what we have learned: salvation = faith = Jesus Resurrection= His Return
-stay in the battle by holding fast to the Scriptures
-stay faithful in prayer
-remember that scripture is the strength and fortitude you can draw from as there is where truth will be found

Everything originates with God:
-Doctrine: the Bible is that authoritative guidance that shapes a person’s beliefs and daily lifestyle. True Biblical doctrine comes from God as an authoritative revelation of His character, will, and truth. Biblical doctrine is foundational: the nature and character of God (including the Trinity), human creation, sin, and the fall, salvation through faith in Jesus Christ, the work of the Holy Spirit and the life of the church, and Christ’s return and future redemption
-Reproof: means exposing sin, faulty beliefs, or straying behavior with clear evidence so a person recognizes they are wrong. Rather than harsh shaming, its purpose is to bring conviction and lead someone back to truth
-Correction: means restoring something that has fallen down or setting a crooked path straight again. Reproof points out what is wrong, correction provides the actionable repair needed to bring a person’s life or beliefs back into alignment with God’s truth
-Instruction: means ongoing, disciplined education that shapes a person’s character, habits, and daily behavior. Doctrine lays out the truth, instruction is the hands-on coaching that teaches a believer how to live out that truth consistently over time.

In 2 Timothy 3:16, the Greek work for instruction is paideia. In the ancient world, paideia referred to the complete upbringing, tutoring, and physical training of a child into a mature adult.

***Learn to live in the world but do not be of the world

Our country is at a crossroad so where do we go from here? Who is this Jesus to you?

It is essential that we look at the spiritual state of our nation. One of the most famous quotes by a Founding Father regarding the necessity of morality and religion for the state is from John Adams in an October 11, 1798 address to the militiamen of Massachusetts.

“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

George Washington (Farewell Address, 1796) declared religion and morality to be “indispensable supports” for political prosperity and human happiness.

James Madison asserted that republican government necessitates sufficient virtue for self-government, otherwise requiring the “chains of despotism” to prevent chaos.

The concluding sentence of the Declaration of Independence, adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776:

“And for the support of the Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”

The pledge fifty-six men signed knowingly committing an act of treason against Great Britain. If the revolution failed, they faced arrest, trial, and execution by hanging. The reality is many signers paid a heavy personal toll of imprisonment, ruined health, or the destruction and loss of their homes and estates during the war.

Beyond physical survival and material wealth, the term “sacred honor” meant staking their personal integrity, public reputation, and moral standing before the world, pledging that they would rather face total ruin than break their word or abandon the fight for self-governance.

Prayers for our nation. Prayers for what we pass down to the next generation. Prayers for steadfastness under all circumstances. “And the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus” (Philippians 4: 7).

Blessings,
dreamsdontfade.com

I heard this song and it is just perfect for a time such as this. Jeremy Camp’s “Shaky Ground”

When all the world
Seems to pierce my soul
And fear and doubt they take control
Your tenderness it pulls me through
Your healing touch it makes me new

Even when I fall on shaky ground my heart will sing
Even when my strength it can’t be found my heart will sing
My heart will sing it is well
It is well with my soul

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdAa4S9vKT4&list=RDzdAa4S9vKT4&start_radio=1

The Coddling of the American Mind Chapter 7: Anxiety and Depression

 Chapter 7: Anxiety and Depression

“Depressed people often stick pins into their own life rafts. The conscious mind can intervene. One is not helpless.” Andrew Solomon (The Noonday Demon: An Atlas of Depression)

-the rise in rates of depression and anxiety among American adolescents in the 2010s

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy:

-goal is to reduce not increase medications

-use of schema which is every bit of brain power to support a view of yourself

-there are exercises that gradually help you recognize negative emotional responses like anger and defensive mind trying to protect that nasty vision of yourself 

-it helps your rational mind to understand that your thoughts are distorted

-to get into the habit to stop letting those cruel, crazy, and destructive voices take hold

-to believe you have the option to act on the negatives or move into the positive thinking mind

-this is a way to learn how to catch his own distortions 

***it is not very hard to identify catastrophizing, dichotomous thinking, labeling, and all the rest 

administrators on campuses are modeling cognitive distortions for students

administration gives the impression that students were in constant danger and in need of protection from a variety of risks and discomforts

-millennial students rolled their eyes at administrative overreaction 

-iGen came in with a fearful attitude about speech coming from students themselves

-this is when the new discussions about safe spaces, trigger warnings, microaggressions, and speech as violence, students often employed arguments and justifications that seemed to come right out of the CBT training manual

there has been changes in childhood  in the United States, like the decline of unsupervised time and the recent rise of social media 

-the overwhelming rise of demand of college mental health professionals 

“We suggested that perhaps some of the very things colleges were doing to protect students from words and ideas ended up increasing the demand for mental health services by inadvertently increasing the use of cognitive distortions.”

***Colleges were not the primary cause of the wave of mental illness among their students; rather, the students seeking help were part of a much larger national wave of adolescent anxiety and depression unlike anything seen in modern times.

-colleges were struggling to cope with the rapidly rising numbers of students who were suffering from mental illness–primarily mood disorders

-the new culture of safetyism can be understood in par as an effort by some students, faculty, and administration to remake the campus in response to this new trend 

-if more students say they feel threatened by certain kinds of speech the more protections are offered

-college students are antifragile, not fragile

-well-intended protections will backfire and make things worse in the long run for the very students we are trying to help

Points:

-there is a declining mental health among American adolescents 

-girls seem to be more affected than boys

-mental health is changing on and off campuses

-the new culture of safetyism emerged after 2013

iGen:

-generations differ psychologically in behavior, values, and mental states of teenagers and college students

-iGen is short for “internet generation” because they are the first generation to grow up with the internet in their pockets (some people use the term Generation Z)

-search engines do not change social relationships, but social media does 

-social media platforms didn’t really draw middle school students until after the iPhone was introduced in 2007

-2007-2012 was a brief span in which social life of the average American teen changed substantially

-social media platforms grew more skilled at grabbing and holding “eyeballs”, so social media grew more and more addictive

-social media’s goal is to consume as much of your time and conscious attention as possible

-it is a dopamine hit 

-you get social-validation feedback on a loop, the more likes and comments the more dopamine

-iGen is the first generation that spent its formative teen years immersed in the giant social and commercial experiment of social media

-trends that are positive: iGen drink less and smoke less, are safer drivers, and are waiting longer to have sex

-distressing trends: teens today spend much more time alone interacting with their screens, they have helicopter parenting who breed fear for children’s safety, and they do not engage in unsupervised learning experiences 

“18 year olds act like 15 year olds used to , and 13 year olds are like 10 year olds. Teens are physically safer than ever, yet they are more mentally vulnerable. “

-these trends are showing up across social classes, races, and ethnicities 

-iGen are not ready for college as were 18year olds of previous generations

-this is why college students are suddenly asking for more protections and adult intervention in their affairs and interpersonal conflicts 

-there is a rapid rise in rates of anxiety and depression 

-studies of mental illness have long shown that girls have higher rates of depression and anxiety than boys do 

-2016: this rate widened to one out of every five girls reported symptoms that met the criteria for having experienced a major depressive episode in the previous year 

-it might be that the bar has been lowered for giving  out diagnosis of depression

-encouraging more people to use the language of therapy and mental illness are likely to have some negative effects too

-labeling can be a powerful cognitive distortion

Ex. depression becomes part of your identity and then over time you’ll develop corresponding schemas about yourself  (I’m no good and my future is hopeless)

-continual confirmation increases the mental illness

-it is essential to weaken the grip of depression

Antisocial Media:

-the surge in mental illness and suicide has been influenced by the rapid of smartphones and social media into the lives of teenagers beginning around 2007

-one of  the main causes of mental health crisis began around 2011 where there is a connection between digital media use and mental health problems

-the deterioration adolescent mental health continues 

“Twenge finds that there are just two activities that are significantly correlated with depression and other suicide-related outcomes (such as considering suicide, making a plan, or making an actual attempt): electronic device use (such as a smartphone, tablet, or computer) and watching T.V.”

-five activities that have inverse relationships with depression: sports and other forms of exercise, attending religious services, reading books and other print media, in-person social interactions, and doing homework

-There is a screen vs. non screen 

-kids using 2 hours a day of screen time do not have elevated risk of depression

-kids who spend less time off screens especially if engaged in nonscreen social activities are at lower risk for depression and suicidal thinking

-humans are an “ultrasocial” species

-humans are not just “social” like chimpanzees 

-humans are more like bees, they are able to work together in large groups, with a clear division of labor

-humans love teams, team sports, synchronized movements, and anything else that gives us the feeling of “one for all, and all for one”

***social media makes it easier than ever to create large groups, but those “virtual” groups are not the same as in-person connections; they do not satisfy the need for belonging in the same way

-it is worth remembering that humans’ neural architecture

-they need continuous face-to-face contact

-the decrease of face-to-face interactions decreases or removes the system’s key inputs may risk destabilization of the system 

-electronic devices are not generally harmful for highly sociable kids

-potentially negative impact of screens and social media might depend on the amount of time teens teens spend with other people 

-electronic devices are harmful not just because they take kids away from face-to-face interactions

Why Is It Mostly Girls Who Suffer:

-mental health has deteriorated much further among iGen girls than among iGen boys 

-total screen ime is correlated with bad mental health outcomes 

-social media presents “curated” versions of lives

-girls may be more adversely affected than boys by the gap between appearance and reality

-many have observed that for girls, more than for boys, social life revolves around inclusion and exclusion

-the increase of boys and girls scrolling through hundreds of each photos, there is an increase of FOMO (fear of missing out)

-seeing images of friends doing something she/he was invited to but couldn’t go can increase the FOBLO (fear of being left out)

-these produce a different psychological effect than when she is intentionally not invited (left out)

“Girls use social media more often, giving them additional opportunities to feel excluded and lonely when they see their friends or classmates getting together without them.”

-the number of teens of all ages who feel left out, whether boys or girls, is at an all-time high from 2010 to 2015

-the consequences of social media curation is that girls are bombarded with images of girls and women whose beauty is artificially enhanced, making girls ever more insecure about their own appearance

-models whose images are altered nowadays

-platforms such as Snapchat and Instagram provide “filters”

-these filters make noses smaller, lips bigger, and skin smoother

-this has led to the need to have plastic surgery 

-social media may be harder on girls is that girls and boys are aggressive in different ways

-Girls are more “relationally” aggressive

-Girls try to hurt their rivals’ relationships, reputations, and social status

Ex. by using social media to make sure other girls know who is intentionally being left out 

-Boys aggression is generally delivered in person, so they can escape from it when they go home

-for Girls on social media, they can never escape 

iGen Goes to College:

-they started arriving on college campuses in September 2013

-by May 2017, when the eldest members began graduating

-these are they years in which the new culture of safetyism seemed to emerge from out of nowhere

-these are also the years in which college mental health clinics found themselves suddenly overwhelmed by new demand 

2015-2016:

-collected data from 139 colleges: half of all students surveyed reported having attended counseling from mental health concerns

-the only mental health concerns that were increasing in recent years were anxiety and depression

-between 2012-2016 has seen an 125% increase for male college students

-between 2012-2016 has seen an 150% increase for female college students

-iGen college students think about themselves very differently than did Millennials

-one out of every seven women at U.S. universities now thinks of herself as having a psychological disorder, up from just one in eighteen women in the last years of the MIllennials 

-these years also saw a rise in self-reports of anxiety as the reason for seeking help

-37% of students had come through the doors to counseling centers in 2009 on college campuses

-it reached 46% in 2013

-it climbed to 51% in 2016

-it is now the by far the leading problem that college students seek treatment

-there has been a substantial increase in rates of self-injury and suicide among college students

-students are more likely to self-diagnosing their mental illnesses

-there is an increase of changes of the minds and lives of adolescents before they reached college

-when growing numbers of depressed and anxious students began arriving on campuses beginning in 2013

-this is bound to have some effect on university culture and norms 

-the universities didn’t create the mental health crisis, but they were responding to one

***this explains why the practices and beliefs of safetyism spread so quickly after 2013

***Safetyism does not help students who suffer from anxiety and depression

***Safetyism is likely to make things even worse for students who already struggle with mood disorders

***Safetyism inflicts collateral damage on the university’s culture of free inquiry

***it teaches students to see words as violence and to interpret ideas and speakers as safe versus dangerous rather than merely as true versus false

-this promotes the intensification of a call-out culture

-depression and anxiety tend to go together 

-both conditions create strong negative emotions

-they feed on emotional reasoning

Anxiety:

-anxiety changes the brain in pervasive ways such that threats seem to jump out at the person even in ambiguous or harmless circumstances

-anxious students are more likely to perceive danger in innocent questions

Ex. perceived microaggressions leading to trigger warnings that leads them to want to disinvite speakers or for someone to create a safe space as an alternative to the lecture 

Depression:

-depression distorts cognition and gives people much more negative views than are warranted about themselves, other people, the world, and the future

-problems loom larger and seem more pervasive 

-the ability to deal with problems is not longer internal

-the internal can’t handle the external problems the person is exposed to

”Rpeated failure to escape from what is perceived to be a bad situation can create a mental state that psychologist Martin Seligman called “learned helplessness,” in which a person believes that escape is impossible and therefore stops trying, even in new situations where effort would be rewarded.”

-when people are depressed, or when their anxiety set their threat-response system on high alert

“They succumb to a “hostile attribution bias,” which means they are more likely to see hostility in benign or even benevolent people, communications, and situations.”

-Misunderstandings are more likely to escalate into large-scale conflicts 

Screen Time: A Caution about Caution

-kids screen time must be monitored and not outweigh in the hours they interact in face-to-face activities

-what is known is that the increase of smartphone use, screen time, and isolation has affected the rates of mood disorders which has quickly risen in the 2010s

-there needs to be more research on the impact of smartphones, and social media both the benefits and the harms

-the quality of teenager’s relationships should be more impactful than that of technology

“Social network sites benefit their users when they are used to make meaningful social connections and harm their users through pitfalls such as isolation and social comparison when they are not.”

-there is enough evidence to support placing time limits on device use

-also limiting or prohibiting the use of  platforms that amplify social  comparison rather than social connection

Sum:

-national rise in adolescent anxiety and depression that began around 2011

-the generation born between 1995-2012 are called iGen (or Gen Z)

-this generation is very different from the Millennials 

-iGen generation is growing up more slowly

-iGen are missing unsupervised developmental milestones on the path to autonomy (ex. Getting Dr. license on 16th birthday-many 18 year-olds don’t have one yet)

-iGen has a far higher rates of anxiety and depression

-iGen has had an increase of self-harm and rising suicide rates

-frequent use of smartphones and other electronic devices have seen an increase of anxiety and depression

-the younger the child on social media the worse the mental health outcomes

-there has been a critical loss of face-to-face social interactions

-social comparisons have affected girls (digitally enhanced beauty, being left out, relational aggression)

-social media is harder to escape 

-iGen’s arrival on college coincides with the arrival of intensification of the culture of safetyism from 2013-2017

-member of iGen may be especially attracted to the overprotection offered by the culture of safetyism

-campuses have experienced higher levels of anxiety and depression levels that have changed the cognition where students have a tendency to see the world as more dangerous and hostile than it really is