When can you be in charge, but not really have a position?
Elizabeth Warren is climbing on board of Obama’s political agenda. Since the president did not appoint her as head of the new Consumer Protection Agency because if he did, he would have to go through the Senate confirmation process. So instead he made her the executive secretary and the only employee. Which by default, puts her in charge. A slight sneaky move which is normal for this administration.Why does it matter that she is in charge of anything? Well, she is speaking at/for along with participating in “down with capitalism” movement.
Two months ago in July she spoke at an event with George Soros and Van Jones.
She also spoke at a conference with Soros in March.
Arianna Huffington calls Warren her hero. Michael Moore loves her. Socialist Senator Bernie Sanders urged Obama to pick her. Al Franken wrote a letter in support of her.
She spoke at Netroots Nation conference 2010, Building a Progressive Economic Vision. She said then, “Remember Franklin Roosevelt faced his economic royalists. Remember it took him years to get his entire economic package into place. It was tough, but it paid off.”
Andy Stern tweeted about her. He said Chris Dodd is wrong: The Obama administration should do what is right for consumers and appoint Elizabeth Warren to enforce the new laws fairly. She’s not going to be enforcing the laws. She’s writing the laws.
By the way, she spoke at SEIU at one of their conferences back in 2010, way back in 2010, in May of this year. The AFL CIO has also come out and endorsed Warren.
Elizabeth Warren has been overseeing TARP to make sure that’s been fairly given out. Once again why is this important? Ever see Capitalism: A Love Story by Michael Moore?
MOORE: This is what I’ve just come to believe is that capitalism in and of itself, at least the capitalism we know now, is, it’s immoral, it’s not Democratic, and worst of all, it doesn’t work. And they’ve proven it doesn’t work.
WARREN: But we made up these rules. And the rules, the rules are of men, of people. We pick what the rules are. The rules have not been written for ordinary families. For the people who actually do the work. We have to rewrite those rules.
Down with capitalism and let’s go for redistribution of wealth. Might want to take a quick look at the redistribution highlights.
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Long before America was even an idea, this land of plenty was home to many peoples. To British and French, to Dutch and Spanish, to Mexican…To countless Indian tribes. We all shared the same land. We didn’t always get along, but over the centuries what eventually bound us together, what made us all Americans was not a matter of blood, it wasn’t a matter of birth. It was faith and fidelity to the shared values that we all hold so dear. We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal, endowed with certain inalienable rights, life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
What is left out? The part that he’s missing there is that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights. Why leave out “by their creator?” Changing the words changes the views of America.
Then our environment is under attack and connected to our economy where Obama’s Holdren changes his political tune to make way for a better environment? Does that include redistribution of wealth?
REPORTER: No, I want to just ask you, you wrote a massive campaign must be launched to restore high quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States in your book Human Ecology. Could you explain what you meant by de-developing the United States?
REPORTER: And you also talked about a world of zero net physical growth? Could you talk about that a little bit?
REPORTER: That was in your World Bank essay.
REPORTER: CNSnews.com interviewed Holdren in June of this year and he said his past work is, a quote, stale topic.
REPORTER: I just want to I just want to ask you real quick about a lot of your past work. I’ve read
HOLDREN: No, this is a stale topic.
He may not want to discuss his ideas of redistributing wealth, but that is happening at a huge cost to Americans.
Once again which groups will not redistributing their wealth? How do you pay for your house? by Michelle Malkin
How can anymore connections between those working with Obama make people ask questions about the future of America?
DDF
